A brief is not a wish list
Tell an AI “modern, clean, professional” and you get the average of every site ever described that way. It only becomes usable with a decision that rules something out: who the site is for, what it does not offer, and which action should stand at the end.
The positioning in one sentence
The sentence names the offer and the audience and fits on one line. It is the only part of the brief that later appears almost word for word on the site, usually as the subtitle in the opening. If it needs two clauses, the positioning is not finished.
One goal, not four
Calls, appointments, enquiries, purchases or applications. Each of these leads to a different structure, a different first screen and a different button. Name all four and you get a site that does none of them well.
What you do not offer belongs in the brief
The boundary prevents the most common kind of error: an AI generously adds what is usual in your field. A tax practice then gets a page about legal advice it is not allowed to give.
Three tone words are enough, nine are on offer
Sober, warm, direct, playful, premium, down-to-earth, technical, personal, bold. More than three cancel each other out, and the file ends up describing every website. Two opposing words together are allowed, by the way, and often the most interesting choice.
The file is Markdown, on purpose
Every AI reads Markdown without a detour, it opens in any editor, and it survives any change of tooling. You hand your AI the file and tell it to read it before building. After that every change is one sentence in chat instead of a fresh explanation from scratch.
It belongs with the project, not in your downloads folder
Put the file next to the code and your AI finds it again in every later session. In the AI Website Templates that place is Knowledge/, and the built-in skills read it on their own.
Nine questions, because nobody answers twenty
We shortened the form several times. What is left are the details an AI would otherwise have to guess. Everything else it can decide itself, and for font sizes, spacing and the order of sections its decision is usually better than a specification.
It does not replace a conversation about money
The DNA describes what the website should be. It says nothing about whether the effort is worth it and who carries it. That stays a decision you make, and it comes easier once the file shows how much substance is actually there.